KASMEJ
Kastamonu Medical Journal

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

eISSN: 2757-9336
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Barriers to end-of-life decisions and care objectives in intensive care units
Abstract
Aims: Technological advancements have played a crucial role in the advanced development of organ support systems in intensive care units (ICUs). While the utilization of support systems enhances patient discharge rates, it also extends the ICU stay of patients with terminal comorbidities who have no chance of survival. This elongation of the dying process, which is the inevitable outcome, results in a suspension of life in a sense. Hence, the effective implementation of end-of-life decisions and care stands as one of the crucial steps in the intensive care process. The objective of this study is to identify barriers to end-of-life decision-making and care in intensive care settings. Its aim is to facilitate a comprehensive, suitable, and peaceful experience for patients at the end of life and their families by making the necessary arrangements.
Methods: This survey study involved physicians and nurses evaluating the prepared questionnaire questions concerning the challenges encountered in intensive care settings.
Results: The most important barriers to making end-of-life decisions in intensive care were; among clinician-related factors, concern about legal liability for withholding life-sustaining treatments was 98 (79.7%), among institutional and ICU-related factors, the lack of regulated protocols and standards for end-of-life decisions and care was 96 (78%), among family-related factors, unrealistic expectations of patients and/or families about the prognosis or effectiveness of ICU treatment was 83 (67.5%), and disagreements among family members about end-of-life decisions was 80 (65%).Regarding end-of-life care, the admission of patients to the intensive care unit who would not benefit from treatments in the intensive care unit was rated as 110 (89.4%) and the absence of palliative care services to which a dying patient could be transferred was rated as 108 (87.8%).
Conclusion: Providing unavailing treatments to patients who will not benefit from intensive care interventions results in a decline in quality of life, increased distress among family members, and burnout among intensive care staff. Therefore, end-of-life decisions and care should be effectively implemented in intensive care units. Ensuring adequate training, fostering effective communication between clinicians and families, and maximizing collaboration and communication with the ICU team and other medical departments can facilitate prompt and effective decision-making regarding end-of-life care.

Keywords : Intensive care, intensive care health surveys, communication, end of life decision, end of life care

Download Article


1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations between end-of-lifediscussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiverbereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1665-1673.
2. Oczkowski SJW, Chung HO, Hanvey L, et al. You JJ Communication toolsfor end-of-life decision-making in the intensive care unit: a systematicreview and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2016;20(97):1-19.
3. Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, et al. The use of life-sustainingtreatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc.2002;50(5):930-934.
4. Heyland DK, Lavery JV, Tranmer J, et al. The final days: an analysis ofthe dying experience in Ontario. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 2000;33(6):356-361.
5. Westphal D, McKee S. End-of-life decision making in the intensive careunit: physician and nurse perspectives. Am J Med Qual 2009;24(3):222e9.
6. Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B, et al. Discrepancies between perceptionsby physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(10):1310-1315.
7. The Support Principle Investigators. A controlled trial to improve carefor seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognosesand preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (Support). JAMA1995;274:1591-1598.
8. Baggs JG, Ryan SA, Phelps CE, et al. The association betweeninterdisciplinary collaboration and patient outcomes in a medicalintensive care unit. Heart Lung.1992;21(1):18-24.
9. Higgins LW. Nurses’ perceptions of collaborative nurse-physician transferdecision making as a predictor of patient outcomes in a medical intensivecare unit. J Adv Nurs 1999;29(6):1434-1443.
10. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, et al. Half the families of intensive careunit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. CritCare Med. 2000;28(8):3044-3049.
11. Teno JM, Fisher E, Hamel MB, et al. Decision-making and outcomes ofprolonged ICU stays in seriously ill patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(5)(suppl):S70-S74
12. Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, et al. The clinical course of advanceddementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1529-1538.
13. Zier LS, Burack JH, Micco G, et al. Surrogate decision makers’ responsesto physicians’ predictions of medical futility. Chest. 2009;136(1):110-117.
14. Zakhour M, LaBrant L, Rimel BJ, et al. Too much, too late: Aggressivemeasures and the timing of end of life care discussions in women withgynecologic malignancies. Gynecologic Oncology. 2015;138(2):383-387.
15. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. Barriers to goals of care discussionswith seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families a multicentersurvey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549-556.
16. Nelson JE, Angus DC, Weissfeld LA, et al. End-of-life care for the criticallyill: a national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(10):2547-2553
17. Iranmanesh S, Banazadeh M, Forozy MA. Nursing staff ’s perception ofbarriers in providing end-of-life care to terminally ill pediatric patients inSoutheast Iran. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016;33(2):115-123.
18. Curtis JR, Vincent JL. Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensivecare unit. Lancet. 2016;376(9749):1347-1353.
19. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by theAmerican College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med.2008;36(3):953-963.
20. Bucher HU, Klein SD, Hendriks MJ, et al Decision-making at the limit ofviability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physiciansand nurses. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z
21. Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall LJ. Negotiating crosscultural issues at the endof life: ‘‘you got to go where he lives.’’ JAMA. 2001;286(23):2993-3001.
22. Pham K, Thornton JD, Engelberg RA, et al. Alterations during medicalinterpretation of ICU family conferences that interfere with or enhancecommunication. Chest. 2008;134(1):109-116.
23. Norris WM, Wenrich MD, Nielsen EL, et al. Communication about end-of-life care between language-discordant patients and clinicians: insightsfrom medical interpreters. J.Palliat Med. 2005;8(5):1016-1024.
Article available in :
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2023
Page : 116-121
https://doi.org/10.51271/KMJ-0111
Article Information
Received : 05 Haz 2023
Accepted : 24 Tem 2023
Published : 22 Eyl 2023
Corresponding Author :

Ahmet Sari: University of Health Sciences (HSU)/ Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation ICU

[email protected]
Citation : Sari A, Ekinci O. Barriers to end-of-life decisions and care objectives in intensive care units. Kastamonu Med J. 2023;3(3):116-121.

Read: 534
Cited: 0
Download : 413
_Footer