KASMEJ
Kastamonu Medical Journal

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

eISSN: 2757-9336
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Online Manuscript System

Index
Original Article
Permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with traditional (blind) technique: 10 years experience
Abstract
Aims: In this study, complications and patency rates of permanent hemodialysis catheters, all inserted with traditional (blind) techniques in our clinic, were evaluated.
Methods: Between June 2012 and June 2022, with the traditional (blind) technique, 627 patients were inserted with permanent hemodialysis catheters. These 627 patients were included in this study. Demographic characteristics of the patients, catheter insertion location and techniques, reasons for removal, duration of use, and catheter-related complications were recorded.
Results: Between June 2012 and June 2022, 720 permanent hemodialysis catheters were inserted into 627 patients in our clinic. 350 patients male, and 277 patients were female. The mean age was 45.35 ± 15.9 (16-82 years). 610 catheters were inserted into the right jugular vein (84.7%), 90 catheters were inserted (12.5%) into the right femoral vein, 11 catheters (1.52%) were inserted into the left femoral vein, and 9 catheters (1.25%) were inserted into the left jugular vein. The need for re-catheter insertion developed in 93 patients. The reasons for re-catheter insertion were infection in 20 patients, intracatheter thrombosis in 63 patients, catheter malposition in 5 patients, and other causes in 5 patients.
Conclusion: The permanent hemodialysis catheter placement method depends on the clinician's experience. Complication rates for permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with the traditional (blind) technique are similar to other methods.

Keywords : Hemodialysis, catheter, complication

Download Article


1. Süleymanlar G, Utaş C, Arinsoy T, et al. A population-based survey of chronic renal disease in Turkey-the CREDIT study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(6):1862-1871. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq656
2. Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ, et al. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(2):471-480. doi:10.2215/CJN.05021107
3. Fila B, Ibeas J, Tey RR, Lovcic V, Zibar L. Arteriovenous fistula for haemodialysis: The role of surgical experience and vascular access education. Nefrologia. 2016;36(2):89-94. doi:10.1016/j.nefro.2015.07.003
4. Douglas LL, Cadogan CA, Rattray CA, Barton EN. The mid-forearm arteriovenous fistula as vascular access for haemodialysis. West Indian Med J. 2001;50(4):304-308.
5. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(Suppl 1):S248-S273. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.04.040
6. Hemodialysis Adequacy 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;48(Suppl 1):S2-S90. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.03.051
7. Boehm M, Bonthuis M, Noordzij M, et al. Hemodialysis vascular access and subsequent transplantation: a report from the ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(4):713-721.
8. Feldman HI, Held PJ, Hutchinson JT, Stoiber E, Hartigan MF, Berlin JA. Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity in the United States. Kidney Int. 1993;43(5):1091-1096. doi:10.1038/ki.1993.153
9. Rabindranath KS, Kumar E, Shail R, Vaux EC. Ultrasound use for the placement of haemodialysis catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (11):CD005279. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005279.pub4
10. Kornbau C, Lee KC, Hughes GD, Firstenberg MS. Central line complications. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015;5(3):170-178.
11. Nadig C, Leidig M, Schmiedeke T, Höffken B. The use of ultrasound for the placement of dialysis catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(4):978-981. doi:10.1093/ndt/13.4.978
12. Vats HS. Complications of catheters: tunneled and nontunneled. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012;19(3):188-194. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.004
13. Jean G, Charra B, Chazot C, Vanel T, Terrat JC, Hurot JM. Long-term outcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters: a controlled study. Blood Purif. 2001;19(4):401-407. doi:10.1159/000046971
14. Coker MA, Black JR, Li Y, et al. An analysis of potential predictors of tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection or dysfunction. J Vasc Access. 2019;20(4):380-385. doi:10.1177/1129729818809669
15. Bansal R, Agarwal SK, Tiwari SC, Dash SC. A prospective randomized study to compare ultrasound-guided with nonultrasound-guided double lumen internal jugular catheter insertion as a temporary hemodialysis access. Ren Fail. 2005;27(5):561-564. doi:10.1080/08860220500199084
16. Aydin Z, Gursu M, Uzun S, et al. Placement of hemodialysis catheters with a technical, functional, and anatomical viewpoint. Int J Nephrol. 2012; 2012:302826. doi:10.1155/2012/302826
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2024
Page : 80-83
https://doi.org/10.51271/KMJ-0148
Article Information
Received : 05 May 2024
Accepted : 03 Haz 2024
Published : 01 Eyl 2024
Corresponding Author :

Güler Gülsen Ersoy: Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kastamonu, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Tamtekin B, Ersoy GG. Permanent hemodialysis catheters inserted with traditional (blind) technique: 10 years experience. Kastamonu Med J. 2024;4(3):80-83.

Read: 343
Cited: 0
Download : 253
_Footer