KASMEJ

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
ERCP outcomes in an aging population: single-center observations
Aims: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a critical procedure for diagnosing and treating biliary and pancreatic disorders, particularly in elderly populations where these conditions are prevalent. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and complications of ERCP in an elderly cohort at a single center.
Methods: This retrospective study included 169 patients who underwent ERCP, with a mean age of 66 years (range 19-92). The majority were female (51.5%). Indications, procedural success rates, and complications were analyzed, with a focus on the presence of periampullary diverticula and previous sphincterotomies.
Results: The overall procedural success rate was 85.8%. The most common indication was cholangitis (63.9%), followed by biliary pancreatitis (15.4%) and asymptomatic choledocholithiasis (11.2%). Periampullary diverticula were present in 16.3% of patients, predominantly among older individuals. Difficult cannulation occurred in 20% of cases, with successful biliary cannulation achieved using various techniques. Stones were found in the common bile duct in 95% of patients and were successfully cleared in the same percentage. The overall complication rate was 13.8%, with bleeding (9.5%), pancreatitis (1.8%), and perforation (0.6%) being the most common. Complication rates were not significantly associated with age, gender, or the presence of diverticula, but were lower in patients with prior sphincterotomies.
Conclusion: ERCP is effective in managing biliary and pancreatic diseases in elderly patients, with a high success rate and manageable complication profile. Prior sphincterotomy significantly reduces the risk of complications. These findings underscore the importance of experienced endoscopists and tailored approaches for elderly patients undergoing ERCP.


1. Solanki S, Kichloo A, Dahiya DS, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with liver cirrhosis: analysis of trends and outcomes from the national inpatient sample database. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(7):618-626. doi:10.1097/MCG. 0000000000001573
2. Meseeha M, Attia M. Endoscopic Retrograde cholangiopancreatography. StatPearls-NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK 493160/ Published August 8, 2023.
3. Mashiana HS, Jayaraj M, Liu X, Mohan BP, Azab M, Ohning G. Safety of ERCP in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis: 837. Offic J Am College Gastroenterol. ACG. 2017;112:S471-S472.
4. Demir T, Ustaoglu M. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography according to the difficulty of the procedure. Precis Med Sci. 2022;12(1):4-9. doi:10.1002/prm2.12088
5. Asıl COM, Kıraç CO, Demir A. 4 yıllık endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyopankreatografi vakalarımızın retrospektif değerlendirilmesi. Genel Tıp Derg. 2016;26(2):53-57.
6. Fidan S, Coşar A. Endoskopik retrograd kolanjiyopankreatografinin endikasyonları, sonuçları ve komplikasyonları: Doğu Karadeniz’deki üçüncü basamak bir merkezin 3 yıllık verileri. Akademik Gastroenterol Derg. 2020;19(3):129-135. doi:10.17941/agd.836604
7. Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(1):112-125. doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02463-0
8. Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Failed biliary cannulation: clinical and technical outcomes after tertiary referral endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(45):4993-4998. doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i45.4993
9. Zoepf T, Zoepf DS, Arnold JC, Benz C, Riemann JF. The relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and disorders of the biliopancreatic system: analysis of 350 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(1):56-61. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.115334
10. Hu Y, Kou DQ, Guo SB. The influence of periampullary diverticula on ERCP for treatment of common bile duct stones. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1): 11477. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68471-8
11. Zippi M, Traversa G, Pica R, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in patients with periampullary duodenal diverticula (PAD). Clin Ter. 2014;165(4): e291-e294. doi:10.7417/CT.2014.1745
12. Mu P, Yue P, Li F, et al. Does periampullary diverticulum affect ERCP cannulation and post-procedure complications? An up-to-date meta-analysis. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020;31(3):193-204. doi:10.5152/tjg.2020. 19058
13. Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Afzali ES, Shahnazi A, et al. ERCP features and outcome in patients with periampullary duodenal diverticulum. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2013;2013:217261. doi:10.1155/2013/217261
14. Karaahmet F, Kekilli M. The presence of periampullary diverticulum increased the complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(9):1009-1012. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001172
15. Chen L, Xia L, Lu Y, Bie L, Gong B. Influence of periampullary diverticulum on the occurrence of pancreaticobiliary diseases and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(1):105-111. doi:10.1097/MEG.000000000 0000744
16. Corral JE, Mousa OY, Kröner PT, Gomez V, Lukens FJ. Impact of periampullary diverticulum on ERCP performance: a matched case-control study. Clin Endosc. 2019;52(1):65-71. doi:10.5946/ce.2018.070
17. Koc B, Bircan HY, Adas G, et al. Complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: minimal invasive surgical recommendations. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113073. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113073
18. Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013;9(8):496-504.
19. Holt N, Saber E, Flores JE, Thomson A. ERCP in patients with prior sphincterotomy has a 50% lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis and fewer unplanned hospital admissions. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022; 57(12):1517-1521. doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2094723
20. Moradi M, Uslu NC. The impacts of population aging on Turkey’s economic growth: an empirical analysis with ARDL model. J Business, Economics Finance. 2020;9(4):292-303. doi:10.17261/pressacademia. 2020.1311
21. World Health Organization: WHO. Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Published October 1, 2022.
22. Day LW, Lin L, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2014; 2(1):E28-E36. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1365281
23. Tokmak S, Cetin MF, Torun S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the very elderly by using a combination of intravenous midazolam, ketamine and pethidine. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021;21(10):887-892. doi:10.1111/ggi.14252
24. Tabak F, Wang HS, Li QP, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: difficult cannulation and adverse events. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(14):2988-2999. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2988
25. Zhang DY, Zhai YQ, Zhang GJ, et al. Risk factors for complications in elderly patients aged 85 years and over undergoing endoscopic biliary stone removal. Front Surg. 2022;9:989061. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.989061 </ol> <p>
Volume 5, Issue 2, 2025
Page : 82-86
_Footer