KASMEJ

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a rural hospital experience
Aims: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries in adults has become a standard approach in hemodynamically stable patients We aimed to investigate the reliability of NOM and the risk factors for failure of NOM.
Methods: Included in the present study were 97 patients who underwent NOM for blunt splenic trauma between 2014 and 2022, whose computed tomography (CT) images, treatment, number of transfused erythrocyte suspensions, complications, duration of hospital stay and mortality data were evaluated retrospectively. The cases that underwent laparotomy due to NOM failure (Group OP, n: 20), and those in whom NOM was successful (Group NOM, n: 77) were statistically compared.
Results: Among the patients, nine were female and 88 were male, with a mean age of 23.7 years. The CT grade was higher in the OP group than in the NOM group (p: <0.001); the number of patients with multiple organ injuries was significantly higher in the OP group (p: 0.026); the number of ES transfused patients was significantly higher in the OP group (p<0.001); and the duration of hospital stay was longer in the OP group (p<0.001). The CT grade and number of ES transfusions (cut off >0.5 units) were determined as risk factors for NOM failure based on a ROC analysis (p<0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of complications, ICU admissions and mortality
Conclusion: Non-operative management is a safe and effective protocol in cases of blunt splenic trauma. High grade injury and the quantity of transfused erythrocyte suspensions (>0.5 units) were found to be predictive for NOM failure.


1. Fransvea P, Costa G, Massa G, Frezza B, Mercantini P, BaIducci G. Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury: is it really so extensively feasible? A critical appraisal of a single-center experience. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;30(32):52.
2. Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F, et al. splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients. World J Emerg Surg. 2017; 12:40.
3. Lepp&auml;niemi A. Nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injuries: from past to present. Scand J Surg. 2019;108(2):95-100.
4. Smith SR, Morris L, Spreadborough S, Al-Obaydi W, D&rsquo;Auria M, White H, Brooks AJ. Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(3):397-406.
5. Kozar R, Crandall M, Shanmuganathan K, et al. Organ ınjury scaling 2018 update: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(6): 1119-1122.
6. Smith J, Caldwell E, D&rsquo;Amours S, et al. Abdominal trauma: a disease in evolution. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(9):790-794.
7. Dupuy DE, Raptopoulos V, Fink MP. Current concepts in splenic trauma. J Intensive Care Med. 1995;10(2):76-90.
8. Buzele R, Barbier L, Sauvanet A, Fantin B. Medical complications following splenectomy. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(4):277-286.
9. Watters JM, Sambasivan CN, Zink K, et al. Splenectomy leads to a persistent hypercoagulable state after trauma. Am J Surg. 2010;199(5):646-651.
10. Zarzaur BL, Rozycki GS. An update on nonoperative management of the spleen in adults. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2(1):e000075.
11. Olthof DC, van der Vlies CH, van der Vlies CH, et al. Consensus strategies for the nonoperative management of patients with blunt splenic injury: a Delphi study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):1567-1574.
12. Godley CD, Warren RL, Sheridan RL, McCabe CJ. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: age over 55 years as a powerful indicator for failure. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(2):133-139.
13. Harbrecht BG, Peitzman AB, Rivera L, et al. Contribution of age and gender to outcome of blunt splenic injury in adults: multicenter study of the eastern association for the surgery of trauma. J Trauma. 2001;51(5): 887-895.
14. Cocanour CS, Moore FA, Ware DN, Marvin RG, Clark JM, Duke JH. Delayed complications of nonoperative management of blunt adult splenic trauma. Arch Surg. 1998;133(6):619-625.
15. Fernandes TM, Dorigatti AE, Pereira BM, Cruvinel Neto J, Zago TM, Fraga GP. Nonoperative management of splenic injury grade IV is safe using rigid protocol. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(4):323-329.
16. Malhotra AK, Carter RF, Lebman DA, et al. Preservation of splenic immunocompetence after splenic artery angioembolization for blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1126-1131.
17. Sartorelli KH, Frumiento C, Rogers FB. Nonoperative management of hepatic,splenic,and renal injuries in adults with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 2000;49(1):56-62.
18. Uran&uuml;s S, Pfeifer J. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury. World J.Surg. 2001;25(11):1405-1407.
19. Velmahos GC, Chan LS, Kamel E. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries; have we gone too far ?. Arch Surg. 2000;135(6):674-681.
20. Gheju I, Venter MD, Beuran M, et al. Grade IV blunt splenic injury-the role of proximal angioembolization. A case report and review of literature. J Med Life. 2013;6(4):369-375.
21. Sclafani SJA, Shaftan GW. Nonoperative salvage of computed tomography-diagnosed splenic injuries: utilization of angiography for triage and embolization for hemostasis. J Trauma. 1995;39(5):818-825.
22. Nann S, Clarke M, Jog S, Aromataris E. Non-operative management of high-grade splenic injury: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22(4):666-672.
23. Matsumoto S, Aoki M, Shimizu M, Funabiki T. A clinical prediction model for non-operative management failure in patients with high-grade blunt splenic injury. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e20537. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20537
Volume 4, Issue 4, 2024
Page : 187-191
_Footer