KASMEJ

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
The effect of fat free mass index and other predictive factors on the severity of patient prosthesis mismatch in patients with isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement
Aims: The development of patient prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an important problem in terms of functional capacity and cardiac events in the postoperative period. Increasing the severity of PPM will increase the transvalvular gradient and retard cardiac recovery. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between PPM severity and fat free mass index (FFMI) and other predictive factors in patients who underwent AVR.
Methods: A total of 73 patients, who underwent isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement between September-2017 and February-2020 and developed PPM in the postoperative period, were included in the study. Preoperative data, operation data, and postoperative follow-up of the included cases were reviewed. Body surface area (BSA) and body mass index (BMI) were calculated using the height and weight measurements of the patients. Echocardiography (ECHO) examinations of the cases were evaluated preoperatively and at the first, sixth and twelfth months after surgery. preoperative body fat ratios were measured using the bioimpedance method and FFMIs were calculated. According to the severity of PPM, patients were divided into 3 groups as mild, moderate, and severe. FFMI and other predictive factors were analyzed by comparing 3 groups among themselves
Results: The effects of preoperative diagnosis, age, gender, BMI, FFMI, aortic cross clamp (ACC), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration on PPM severity were evaluated statistically and no significant effect was observed. It was determined that the size of the prosthetic valve implanted in the patient was closely related to the severity of PPM.
Conclusion: It was seen that the size of the prosthesis to be selected was the most important parameter in terms of PPM severity. Severe PPM has been shown to have a worse prognosis than moderate and mild PPM in many studies. Reducing the severity of PPM may reduce the need for reoperation and the number of cardiac events that may occur. More extensive studies are needed to identify predictive factors associated with PPM severity. In this study, no statistically significant effect of fat free mass index on the severity of patient prosthesis mismatch in patients with isolated mechanical aortic valve replacement was detected


1. Narayan P, Reeves BC, Rizvi SIA, et al. Hemodynamic evaluation and midterm outcome of aortic valve replacement with size 19 perimount prosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(6):1799-1803. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.019
2. Kau T, Sinzig M, Gasser J, et al. Aortic development and anomalies. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007;24(2):141-152. doi:10.1055/s-2007-980040
3. Maeda K, Kuratani T, Yoshioka D, et al. Predicting patient-prosthesis mismatch by aortic root evaluation before aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(1):61-69.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11. 103
4. Castro LJ, Arcidi JM, Fisher AL, Gaudiani VA. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(1):31-36. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03680-9
5. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(1):39-47. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.022
6. Kyle UG, Morabia A, Slosman DO, Mensi N, Unger P, Pichard C. Contribution of body composition to nutritional assessment at hospital admission in 995 patients: a controlled population study. Br J Nutrit. 2001;86(6):725-731. doi:10.1079/BJN2001470
7. Takase M, Nakamura T, Nakaya N, et al. Associations between the combined Fat Mass Index and Fat-free Mass Index with carotid intima-media thickness in a Japanese population: the Tohoku Medical Megabank community-based cohort study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023; 30(3):255-273. doi:10.5551/jat.63523
8. Whalley GA, Gamble GD, Doughty RN, et al. Left ventricular mass correlates with fat-free mass but not fat mass in adults. J Hypertens. 1999;17(4):569-574. doi:10.1097/00004872-199917040-00016
9. Peltz G, Aguirre MT, Sanderson M, Fadden MK. The role of Fat Mass Index in determining obesity. Am J Human Biol. 2010;22(5):639-647. doi:10.1002/ajhb.21056
10. Narumi T, Watanabe T, Kadowaki S, et al. Sarcopenia evaluated by Fat-free Mass Index is an important prognostic factor in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(2):118-122. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.008
11. VanItallie TB, Yang MU, Heymsfield SB, Funk RC, Boileau RA. Height-normalized indices of the body’s fat-free mass and fat mass: potentially useful indicators of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;52(6):953-959. doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.6.953
12. Mohty-Echahidi D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation. 2006; 113(3):420-426. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.546754
13. Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(2):481-489. doi:10.1016/J.ATHORACSUR.2005.07.084
14. Dayan V, Vignolo G, Soca G, Paganini JJ, Brusich D, Pibarot P. Predictors and outcomes of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2016;9(8):924-933. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.026
15. Fuster R, Monteroargudo J, Albarova O, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2005;27(3):441-449. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.022
16. Florath I, Albert A, Rosendahl U, Ennker IC, Ennker J. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch estimated by echocardiographic-determined effective orifice area on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2008;155(6):1135-1142. doi:10.1016/j.ahj. 2007.12.037
17. Daneshvar SA, Rahimtoola SH. Still searching for the elusive scarlet pimpernel of today. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1438-1439. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs082
18. Visser M, van Venrooij LMW, Vulperhorst L, et al. Sarcopenic obesity is associated with adverse clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. Nutrit Metabol Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(6):511-518. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2011. 12.001
19. Kinoshita D, Watanabe T, Sugai T, et al. Fat-free Mass Index is an important predictor for future cardiac events in patients after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2015;132(suppl_3):13842. doi:10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3. 13842
20. Garatti A, Mori F, Innocente F, et al. Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses: is patient-prosthesis mismatch a relevant phenomenon? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):71-77. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur. 2010.08.036
21. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058
Volume 5, Issue 1, 2025
Page : 25-29
_Footer