KASMEJ

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Results of the small bites midline abdominal incision closure after cancer surgery
Aims: The small bite abdominal closure technique has recently been described and popularized, but it still needs to be investigated in oncologic abdominal surgery. This study evaluates the effect of small-bite fascial closure (SBFC) versus standard large-bite fascial closures in surgical oncology patients on incisional hernia rates and local complications.
Methods: This retrospective study compares the outcomes of surgeries performed by the same surgical oncologist before and after adopting the small-bite technique. Patients who underwent midline laparotomy for abdominal malignancy and had at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up were included in the study. Before adopting the SBFC technique, the cohort's fascia closure was performed with loop polydioxanone sutures. In contrast, after starting the SBFC, performed closing with 2-0 polydioxanone sutures and fascial bites spaced 5-8 mm.
Results: The total hernia rate of the included 85 patients was 16.5% (14/85). Patient characteristics were similar in both cohorts. The SBFC severally reduced hernia rates in the mean follow-up of 11.9 ± 5.6 months from 21.8% to 6.8%, but not statistically significant, p=0.124. According to logistic regression modeling, SBFC (AOR=0.085, 95.0% CI 0.008–0.932, p=0044) was independently associated with a lower probability of hernia formation in multivariant analysis. Other factors related to increased hernia rates were smoking (OR=8.850, 95% CI 2.518–31.110, p<0.001), sarcopenia (OR=8.850, 95% CI 2.518–31.110, p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR=3.827, 95% CI 1.045–14.010, p=0.043) and stage 4 cancer disease (OR=12.593, 95% CI 2.565–61.829, p<0.002) in univariate analysis. Surgical site infection, organ or space infection, and complications (Clavien-Dindo) ?3 were lower in the SBFC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (all p>0.005). The early eventration rate was similar. Length of hospital stay was also significantly lower in the SBFC group (p=0.013).
Conclusion: The SBFC technique reduces the risk of incisional hernia development in cancer patients undergoing midline laparotomy.


1. S&ouml;derb&auml;ck H, Masood A, Leo J, Sandblom G. Introduction of small stitch small bite technique: a retrospective long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022;407(6):2527-2535. doi:10.1007/s00423-022-02530-8
2. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, et al. Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138745. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138745
3. Henriksen NA, Deerenberg EB, Venclauskas L, Fortelny RH, Miserez M, Muysoms FE. Meta-analysis on materials and techniques for laparotomy closure: the MATCH review. World J Surg. 2018;42(6):1666-1678. doi:10.1007/s00268-017-4393-9
4. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches. Hernia. 2011;15(3):261-266. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0775-8
5. Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10000):1254-1260. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7
6. Ozcan C, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Berkesoglu M, Ertas E. Impact of small-bite (5 mm) fascial closure on the incidence of incisional hernia following open colorectal cancer surgery: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2024;111(8):znae189. doi:10.1093/bjs/znae189
7. Parsak CK, Gumus S, Gul MO, et al. Clinical impact of sarcopenia on gastric cancer and the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on sarcopenia. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2022;24(6):e1760. doi:10.32592/ircmj. 2022.24.6.1760
8. Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S, et al. Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition. 2016;32(11-12):1200-1205. doi:10. 1016/j.nut.2016.04.003
9. HART Collaborative. Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: hughes abdominal repair randomized trial (HART). Br J Surg. 2022;109(10):943-950. doi:10.1093/bjs/znac198
10. Khor SN, Cheok SHX, Sultana R, Tan EKW. Incidence of incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer surgery &amp; analysis of associated risk factors in Asian population: is laparoscopy any better? Asian J Surg. 2023;46(1):99-104. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.01.029
11. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056-1059. doi:10.1001/archsurg. 2009.189
12. Albertsmeier M , Hofmann A, Baumann P, et al. Effects of the short-stitch technique for midline abdominal closure: short-term results from the randomised-controlled ESTOIH trial. Hernia. 2022;26(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02410-y
13. Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. Br J Surg. 2023;110(12):1732-1768. doi:10.1093/bjs/znad284
14. Dias Rasador AC, Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo S, Fernandez MG, et al. Small bites versus large bites during fascial closure of midline laparotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks. Arch Surg 2024;409(1):104. doi:10.1007/s00423-024-03293-0
Volume 5, Issue 1, 2025
Page : 46-50
_Footer