KASMEJ

Kastamonu Medical Journal regularly publishes internationally qualified issues in the field of Medicine in the light of up-to-date information.

EndNote Style
Index
Erratum
Erratum to "Effects of phantom shocks on anxiety levels, coping skills and sleep quality in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillators"

In the published article titled “Effects of phantom shocks on anxiety levels, coping skills, and sleep quality in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillators” (doi:10.51271/KMJ-0194), two references—listed as numbers 19 and 20 in the references—were inadvertently incorrect. While the citations within the main text of the manuscript correctly referred to the intended sources, the corresponding entries in the reference list mistakenly cited unrelated articles.
The corrected references should read as follows:
19. Elenizi K, Alharthi R. Incidence, risk factors and predictors of phantom shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: state-of-the-art review. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024;13:e18. doi:10.15420/aer.2024.25
20. Pedersen SS, Theuns DA, Jordaens L, Kupper N. Course of anxiety and device-related concerns in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients the first year post-implantation. Europace. 2010;12(8):1119-1126. doi:10.1093/europace/euq154

You can access the original article.
Aims: This study aimed to investigate the effects of phantom shocks on anxiety levels, coping skills, and sleep quality in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Specifically, it examined the relationship between phantom shocks and these psychological variables by comparing ICD recipients who had experienced phantom shocks with those who had not.
Methods: This observational study included 66 patients with ICDs, divided into two groups: those who had experienced phantom shocks (PS+) and those who had not (PS-). An additional control group of 66 participants without heart failure or ICD implantation was also included. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Florida Shock Anxiety Scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS software to compare psychological outcomes across the groups.
Results: Patients in the PS+ group demonstrated significantly poorer sleep quality, higher levels of general anxiety, and greater ICD-related anxiety compared to the PS- group. Furthermore, the PS+ group had a significantly higher prevalence of prior psychiatric diagnoses, including anxiety and depression, compared to both the PS- and control groups. The control group reported the best sleep quality and the lowest anxiety levels overall.
Conclusion: Phantom shocks are associated with impaired sleep quality, elevated anxiety, and increased ICD-related distress in patients with ICDs. These findings underscore the psychological burden faced by ICD recipients, particularly those experiencing phantom shocks. A multidisciplinary approach addressing both physical and psychological aspects is crucial for enhancing the overall well-being of these patients.

Volume 5, Issue 3, 2025
Page : 214
_Footer